References:

Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1994). Observational techniques. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 377–392). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Angrasino, M., & Mays de Perez, K. (2000). Rethinking observation: From method to context. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 673–702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Aquila, F., & Parish, R. (1989). The clash of cultures: Instructional technology and the craft of teaching. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 22(2), 49–56.

Ashley, K., Chi, M., Pinkus, R., & Moore, J. (2004). Modeling learning to reason with cases in engineering ethics: A test domain for intelligent assistance (NSF Proposal Grant Number NSF-LIS 9720341).

Baltes, P., & Staudinger, U. (1993). The search for a psychology of wisdom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 75–80.

Barrett, F. (1999). Knowledge creating as dialogic accomplishment: A constructivist perspective. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity, Vol. 1 (pp. 133–151). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Barron, F. (1995). No rootless flower: An ecology of creativity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Bateson, M. (1999). Ordinary creativity. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity Vol. 1 (pp. 153–171). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Bion, W. (1961). Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books.

Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19, 3–10.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Chi, M. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315.

Cohen, L. (1989). A continuum of adaptive creative behaviors. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 169–183.

Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146–161). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Craft, A. (1998). Educator perspectives on creativity: An English study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 244–257.

Craft, A. (2002). Creativity and early years education. London: Continuum.

Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. New York: Routledge.

Craft, A. (2006). Fostering creativity with wisdom. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 337–350.

Cropley, A. (1997). Creativity and mental health in everyday life. In M. Runco & R. Richards (Eds.), Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health (pp. 231–246). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper.

Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego: Academic.

Dimock, H. (1993). How to observe your group (3rd ed.). North York, ON: Captus.

Donmoyer, R. (1990). Generalizability and the single-case study. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 175–200). New York: Teachers College Press.

Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Mechanisms of insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Duran, R., & Szymanski, M. (1993). Construction of learning and interaction of language minority children in cooperative learning (ERIC Document Reproduction ED 365106).

Ericsson, K., & Smith, J. (1991). Prospects and limits of the empirical study of expertise: An introduction. In K. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 1–38). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361–376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fraser, R., & Mathews, A. (1999). An evaluation of the desirable characteristics of a supervisor. Australian Universities’ Review, 42(1), 5–7.

Gardner, H. (2000). The giftedness matrix: A developmental perspective. In R. Friedman & B. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 77–88).

Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Garner, R. (1992). Self-regulated learning, strategy shifts, and shared expertise: Reactions to Palincsar and Klenk. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 226–229.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). From problem solving to problem finding. In I. Taylor & J. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 90–116). Chicago: Aldine.

Gibbons, J., & Grey, M. (2004). Critical thinking as integral to social work practice. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24(1/2), 19–38.

Glaser, R., & Chi, M. (1988). Overview. In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv–xxviii). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gruber, H. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51.

Gruber, H. (1989). The evolving systems approach to creative work. In D. Wallace & H. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work: Twelve cognitive case studies (pp. 3–24). New York: Oxford University Press.

Gruber, H. (1997). Creative altruism, cooperation, and world peace. In M. Runco & R. Richards (Eds.), Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health (pp. 463–479). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.

Gruber, H., & Wallace, D. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hansen, S. (2004). The supervisor in the project-organized groupwork should participate in developing the students’ project competencies. European Journal of Engineering
Education, 29, 451–459.

Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 331–348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Herzberg, F. (1987). Innovation: Where is the relish? Journal of Creative Behavior, 21, 179–192.

Hmelo, C. (1998). Problem-based learning: Effects on the early acquisition of cognitive skill in medicine. The Journal for the Learning Sciences, 7, 173–208.

Hunter, D., Bailey, A., & Taylor, B. (1995). The art of facilitation. Tucson, AZ: Fischer.

Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.


Jausovec, N. (1994). Metacognition in creative problem-solving. In M. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 77–95). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30, 77–87.

Johnson, E. (1988). Expertise and decision under uncertainty: Performance and process. In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 209–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1987). Research shows the benefits of adult cooperation. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 27–30.

John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.

John-Steiner, V., & Meehan, T. (2000). Creativity and collaboration in knowledge construction. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Krauss, R., & Fussell, S. (1991). Constructing shared communicative environments. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 172–200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, B. (1985). Intellectual origins of Vygotsky’s semiotic analysis. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 66–93). New York:
Cambridge University.

Lesgold, A. (1988). Problem-solving. In R. Sternberg & E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp.188–213). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Levine, H. (1993). Context and scaffolding in developmental studies of mother-child problem solving dyads. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 306–326). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Meador, K., Hunsaker, S., & Kearney, K. (1999). Qualitative research methods for studying creativity. In A. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating
creativity in youth: Research and methods (pp. 239–261). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (1999). Social creativity: Introduction. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity Vol. 1 (pp. 1–45). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Morgan, D. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mumford, M., & Gustafson, S. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43.

Mumford, M., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Redmond, M. (1994). Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. In M. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp.3–39). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Mumford, M., Baughman, W., & Sager, C. (2003). Picking the right material: Cognitive processing skills and their role in creative thought. In M. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative
processes (pp. 19–68). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Neçka, E. (2003). Creative interaction: A conceptual schema for the process of producing ideas and judging outcomes. In M. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative processes (pp. 115–127).
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Novemsky, L. (1998). Second teaching: An exploration of cognitive factors in small group physics learning. Dissertation Abstracts International, A (Humanities and Social Sciences) 59(5-A).

Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Pavlovic, S., & Friedland, B. (1997). Reflectivity in supervision and teaching (ERIC Document Reproduction ED 406115).

Perkins, D. (1988). Creativity and the quest for mechanism. In R. Sternberg & E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 309–336). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Phillips, C. (Ed.). (2002). Group process consultation workshop manual. Alexandria, VA: NTL Institute.

Posner, M. (1988). Introduction: What is it to be an expert? In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xxix–xxxvi). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Raelin, J. (2000). Work-based learning: The new frontier of management development. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Reddy, W. B. (1994). Intervention skills. Toronto: Pfeiffer & Company.

Reilly, R. C. (2005). The synergistic confluence of social creativity, values and the development of shared expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Resnick, L. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Richards, R. (1996). Beyond Piaget: Accepting divergent, chaotic, and creative thought. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 67–86.

Rogers, K. (1999). Is creativity quantitatively measurable? A paradigm for creativity research. In A. Fishkin, B. Cramond, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Investigating creativity in youth: Research and methods. (pp. 217–237). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Runco, M., & Bahleda, M. (1989). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 93–98.

Runco, M., & Chand, I. (1994). Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. In M. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 40–76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Sawyer, R. (2003). Improvised dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation. Westport, CT: Ablex.

Schein, E. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Schwarz, R. (1994). The skilled facilitator: Practical wisdom for developing effective groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency/Doubleday.

Shore, B. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative differences in how gifted children think. In R. Friedman & B. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 167–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Simonton, D. (1985). Quality, quantity, and age: The careers of ten distinguished psychologists. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 21, 241–254.

Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Stake, R. (1994). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sternberg, R. (Ed.). (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. (1998). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 11–20.

Sternberg, R. (2000). Giftedness as developing expertise. In K. Heller, F. Mönks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 55–66). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

Sternberg, R., & Frensch, P. (1992). On being an expert: A cost-benefit analysis. In R. Hoffman (Ed.), The psychology of expertise (pp. 191–204). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Sternberg, R., & Lubart, T. (1999). The concepts of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stough, L. (1994). Skilled performance in individuals with developmental disabilities (ERIC Document Reproduction ED 450500).

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Taylor, C. (1988). Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological approaches (pp. 99–121). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Teasley, S. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse tools and reasoning: Essays in situated cognition (pp. 361–384). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Timperley, H., & Robinson, V. (1997). Collegiality in schools: Its nature and implications for problem-solving (ERIC Document Reproduction ED 413285).

Torrance, E. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43–75). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Voss,