Bramwell, Gillian, Reilly, Rosemary C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7274-4488, Lilly, Frank R., Kronish, Neomi and Chennabathni, Revathi (2011) Creative teachers. Roeper Review, 33 (4). pp. 228-238. ISSN 0278-3193
Preview |
Text (Post-print: final draft post-refereeing) (application/pdf)
206kBCreative_Teachersfinal.pdf - Accepted Version |
Official URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uror20
Abstract
Good teaching is creative teaching, yet there is little research focusing on creative teachers themselves. In this article we report a synthesis of 13 qualitative case studies and two quantitative studies of teachers who demonstrated everyday or local creativity in their work. Themes and categories were identified through constant comparison and inter-relationships among themes were explored. Four themes are described: personal characteristics, community, process, and outcomes. Teachers' creative process emerged from the interaction between their personal characteristics, including personal intelligences, motivation, and values, and the communities in which they worked and lived. This process resulted in a wide variety of outcomes. The findings suggest that cooperation between teachers and administrators is essential for teachers to succeed in creating positive change.
Divisions: | Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Applied Human Sciences |
---|---|
Item Type: | Article |
Refereed: | Yes |
Authors: | Bramwell, Gillian and Reilly, Rosemary C. and Lilly, Frank R. and Kronish, Neomi and Chennabathni, Revathi |
Journal or Publication: | Roeper Review |
Date: | 1 December 2011 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | 10.1080/02783193.2011.603111 |
Keywords: | creative teachers, creative outcomes, creative processes, community, everyday creativity, personal characteristics, teaching practice, case study research, constructivism |
ID Code: | 974917 |
Deposited By: | Rosemary Reilly |
Deposited On: | 02 Nov 2012 19:53 |
Last Modified: | 07 Dec 2020 20:41 |
Additional Information: | The studies on which this synthesis is based are briefly described in an Appendix which can be found at http://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/6747/ |
References:
References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the synthesis.Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to "The social psychology of creativity". Boulder, Co: Westview Press.
Ambrose, D. (2005). Creativity in teaching: Essential knowledge, skills, and dispositions. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 281-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
*Bamford, C., Boursier, J., Bresnen, K., Shank-Farah, D., Slonosky, A., DiZazzo, A. M., Pupo, M., Rhoads, J., McBride, J., Rejskind, G., Mitchell, S., and Reilly, R. (1999, April). You may call it research - I call it coping: Collaborative action research. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Teacher Research, Bishop’s University, Lennoxville, Quebec, Canada.
Bateson, M. C. (1999). Ordinary creativity. In A. Montuori & R. E. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity Vol. 1 (pp. 153-171). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
*Bramwell-Rejskind, G., Halliday, F., & McBride, J. (2008). Creating change: Teachers’ reflections on changing their teaching. In B. M. Shore, M. W. Aulls, & M. A. B. Delcourt (Eds.), Inquiry in education Vol. 2: Overcoming barriers to successful implementation (pp. 207-234). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
*Chennabathni, R. (2005). Case-study of a creative teacher. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Canada. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses @ McGill University. (Publication No. AAT NR25115).
*Chennabathni, R., & Rejskind, G. (2002, May). Portrait of a creative science teacher. In G. Rejskind (Chair), Creative teachers: Portraits, products, and challenges. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Canadian Association of Educational Psychologists, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Craft, A. (2001). "Little c" creativity. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey, & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 45-61). New York: Continuum.
Craft, A. (2002). Creativity and early years education: A lifewide foundation. London, UK: Continuum.
Craft, A., Jeffrey, B. & Leibling M. (Eds.). (2001). Creativity in education. New York: Continuum.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190-212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
*Dagenais, J. (2003). Teaching’s a stage: Personality plays a role. One semester, one class, one teacher. Unpublished MEd. Project, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Dollinger, J., Burke, P. A., & Gump, N. W. (2007). Creativity and values. Journal of Creative Behavior, 19, 91-103.
Fernal, L. W. Jr. (1987). Values and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 21, 312-324.
Gardner, H. (2001). Creators: Multiple intelligences. In K. H. Pfenninger & V. R. Shubik (Eds.), The origins of creativity (pp. 117-144). New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldstein, L. (1997). Teaching with love: A feminist approach to early childhood education. New York: Peter Lang.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Gruber, H. E., & Wallace, D. B. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93-115). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: A psychological perspective. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 143-169). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
*Kronish, N. (1999). The making of a star: Unraveling the mystery of a musician’s success. Unpublished MEd. Project, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
*Kronish, N. B. (2004). Social, cultural, and psychological influences on three promising piano students' decisions to continue taking piano lessons. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Canada. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses @ McGill University. (Publication No. AAT NR12876).
Koof, J., Chen, C., Himsel, A., & Greenberger, E. (2007). Values and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 19, 105-122.
*Lilly, F. R. (2002). Teaching outside of the box: Studying a creative teacher. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Canada. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses @ McGill University. (Publication No. AAT NQ78717).
*Lilly, F. R., & Bramwell-Rejskind, G. (2004). The dynamics of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 102-124.
Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339-350). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
*McBride, J., & Dagenais, J. (2002, May). Portraits of practice. In G. Rejskind (Chair), Creative teachers: Portraits, products, and challenges. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Canadian Association of Educational Psychologists, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need to know about action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
*Mitchell, S. N. (2001). Describing the possible effects of an inquiry curriculum on low-achieving students' causal attributions. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Canada. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses @ McGill University. (Publication No. AAT NQ78735).
*Mitchell S. N. (2002, May). Creativity of sameness. In. G. Rejskind (Chair), Creative teachers: Portraits, products, and challenges. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Canadian Association of Educational Psychologists, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mitchell, S., Reilly, R., Bramwell, G., Solnosky (sic), A., & Lilly, F. (2004). Friendship and choosing groupmates: Preferences for teacher-selected vs. student-selected groupings in high school science classes. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31, 20-32.
Mockros, C. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). The social construction of creative lives. In A. Montuori & R. E. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity, Vol. 1, (pp. 175-218). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Montuori, A., & Purser, R. E. (1999). Social creativity: An introduction. In A. Montuori & R.E. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity (Vol. 1), (pp. 1-45). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
Ochse, R. (1990). Before the gates of excellence: The determinants of creative genius. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Policastro, E., & Gardner, H. (1999). From case study to robust generalizations: An approach to the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 213-225). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
*Reilly, R. C. (2005). The synergistic confluence of social creativity, values and the development of shared expertise. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Canada. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses @ McGill University.(Publication No. AAT NR12935).
*Rejskind, F. G. (1967). Some factors in the creativity of grade seven teachers and pupils. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Rejskind, F. G. (2000). TAG Teachers: Only the creative need apply. Roeper Review, 22, 153-157.
*Rejskind, G., Reilly, R., Mitchell, S., & French, L. (2002, May). Inquiry outcomes. In G. Rejskind (Chair), Creative teachers: Portraits, products, and challenges. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Canadian Association of Educational Psychologists, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
*Rejskind, G., & Sydiaha, D. (2002, May). Creative teachers, creative students? In G. Rejskind (Chair), Creative teachers: Portraits, products, and challenges. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Canadian Association of Educational Psychologists, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
*Riccardi, M. (2001). Down memory lane: "I don't think in word but in ideas" The life of a creative teacher. Unpublished MEd. Project, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
*Ricci, J. O. (2002) The implementation of a school-based language document and curriculum in a private Hong Kong primary school: A case study. Unpublished MEd. Project, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Richards, R. (2007). Everyday creativity: Our hidden potential. In R. Richards (Ed.), Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: Psychological, social, and spiritual perspectives (pp. 25-53). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ripple, R. E. (1989). Ordinary creativity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 189-202.
Sawyer, R. K. (1997). Creativity in performance. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33, 12–20.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Scot, T. P., Callahan, C. M., & Urquhart, J. (2009). Paint-by-number teachers and cookie-cutter students: The unintended effects of high-stakes testing on the education of gifted students. Roeper Review, 31, 40-52.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). The creative society: Genius vis-a-vis the Zeitgeist. In A. Montuori & R.E. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity (Vol. 1) (pp. 265-286). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Dess, N. K. (2001). Creativity for the new millennium. American Psychologist, 56, 332.
Woods, P. (1995). Creative teachers in primary schools. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Repository Staff Only: item control page