Reilly, Rosemary C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7274-4488 (2013) Found poems, member checking and crises of representation. The Qualitative Report, 18 (30). pp. 1-18. ISSN 1052-0147
Preview |
Text (application/pdf)
170kBreilly30.pdf |
Official URL: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR18/reilly30.pdf
Abstract
In order to establish veracity, qualitative researchers frequently rely on member checks to insure credibility by giving participants opportunities to correct errors, challenge interpretations and assess results; however, member checks are not without drawbacks. This paper describes an innovative approach to conducting member checks. Six members of a learning organization participated in two group interviews to examine the use of poetry as a method to promote individual and organizational learning. Several weeks later, participants received a copy of their transcripts and were asked to create a “found poem” to reflect their thoughts and feelings about using poetry as a learning tool. There was resonance between the interview themes produced by traditional open coding methods and those using participant-created found poems. However, the found poems added an emotional depth and connection that was missing from the traditional approach of coding qualitative data. This suggests that participant-created found poems can provide an agentic alternative to the usual method of member checking and also expand the notions of aesthetic approaches within qualitative research.
Divisions: | Concordia University > Faculty of Arts and Science > Applied Human Sciences Concordia University > Research Units > Centre for Human Relations and Community Studies |
---|---|
Item Type: | Article |
Refereed: | Yes |
Authors: | Reilly, Rosemary C. |
Journal or Publication: | The Qualitative Report |
Date: | 15 April 2013 |
Keywords: | Arts-Based Research, Found Poems, Member Checks, Trustworthiness, Crisis of Representation |
ID Code: | 977078 |
Deposited By: | Rosemary Reilly |
Deposited On: | 16 Apr 2013 13:12 |
Last Modified: | 07 Dec 2020 20:41 |
Related URLs: | |
Additional Information: | Parts of this paper were presented at the Qualitative Research In Management and Organization Conference in Albuquerque, NM on April 7, 2010. |
References:
Barry, D., & Hansen, H. (Eds.) (2008). The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Block, P. (2001). The flawless consulting fieldbook and companion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass / Pfeiffer.
Bloor, M. (2004). Addressing social problems through qualitative research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 221–238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bradshaw, M. (2001). Contracts and member checks in qualitative research in human geography: Reason for caution? Area, 33, 202-211. doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00023
Brady, I. (2005). Poetics for a planet: Discourse on some problems of being-in-place. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 979-1026). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Brearley, L., & Darsø, L. (2008). Business studies: Vivifying data and experience through artful approaches. In J. Knowles & A. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 639-652). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Broussine, M. (Ed.). (2008). Creative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bryman, A. (2004). Member validation and check. In M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods (Vol. 2, p. 633). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Butler-Kisber, L. (2010). Qualitative inquiry: Thematic, narrative and arts-informed perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (CIHR, NSERC, & SSHRC). (2010). Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2/Default/
Cho, J., & Trent, A. (2006). Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qualitative Research, 6, 319–340. doi: 10.1177/1468794106065006
Clough, P. (2002). Narratives and fictions in educational research. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Creswell, J. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Cunliffe, A. (2002). Social poetics as management inquiry: A dialogical approach. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 128-146. doi: 10.1177/10592602011002006
Dadds, M., with J. Whitehead (2006, September). Empathetic validity in practitioner research: An exploratory discussion. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association annual conference, Coventry, UK.
Darmer, P. (2006). Poetry as a way to inspire (the management of) the research process. Management Decision, 44, 551-560.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic.
Ellingson, L. (2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Emerson, R., & Pollner, M. (1988). On the use of members’ responses to researchers’ accounts. Human Organization, 47, 189-198.
Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B., & Allen, S. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361-376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Glesne, C. (1997). That rare feeling: Re-presenting research through poetic transcription. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 202-221. doi: 10.1177/107780049700300204
Grisoni, L. (2008). Poetry. In M. Broussine (Ed.), Creative methods in organizational research (pp. 108-127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Grisoni, L., & Kirk, P. (2006). Verse, voice and va va voom!: Illuminating management processes through poetry. Management Decision, 44, 512-525.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Krueger, R., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Leggo, C. (2008). Astonishing silence: Knowing in poetry. In J. Knowles & A. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 165-174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Manning, K. (1997). Authenticity in constructivist inquiry: Methodological considerations without prescription. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 93-115. doi: 10.1177/107780049700300105
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Morgan, D. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nissley, N. (2002). Arts-based learning in management education. In C. Wankel & R. DeFillippi (Eds.), Rethinking management education for the 21st century (pp. 27-61). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Reilly, R. C. (2010, July). The role of arts-based methods in promoting learning in organizations. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Knowledge, Culture and Change in Organizations, Montreal, QC.
Reilly, R. C., & Mcbrearty, M. (2010). “Getting there is not a very neat circle or process”: An illustrative view of complexity within a knowledge management learning community. In A. Tait & K. Richardson (Eds.), Complexity and knowledge management- Understanding the role of knowledge in the management of social networks (Vol. 4, pp. 237-265). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency / Doubleday.
Senge, P., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Smith, B., & Kleiner, A. (1994). The fifth discipline field book: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York, NY: Currency / Doubleday.
Strati, A. (2000). The aesthetic approach in organization studies. In S.
Linstead & H. Höpfl (Eds.), The aesthetics of organization (pp. 13-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Taylor, S., & Hansen, H. (2005). Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1211-1231. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00539.x
Tracy, S. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight ''big-tent'' criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 837-851. doi: 10.1177/1077800410383121
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Repository Staff Only: item control page