Login | Register

Seismic resilience and performance design approach for concrete moment resisting frame buildings equipped with yielding restrained braces

Title:

Seismic resilience and performance design approach for concrete moment resisting frame buildings equipped with yielding restrained braces

Naghshineh, Ali (2021) Seismic resilience and performance design approach for concrete moment resisting frame buildings equipped with yielding restrained braces. PhD thesis, Concordia University.

[thumbnail of Naghshineh_PhD_S2022.pdf]
Preview
Text (application/pdf)
Naghshineh_PhD_S2022.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Spectrum Terms of Access.
29MB

Abstract

Advanced structural dissipation devices can be classified into three major groups including passive, semi-active and active control energy dissipations. While all of these technologies play an important role in structural design, passive energy dissipation devices are the most common types of control systems which can be classified into six types including Metallic Dampers, Friction Dampers, Viscoelastic Dampers, Viscous Fluid Dampers, Tuned Mass Dampers, and Tuned Liquid Dampers. The primary purpose of this research is to decrease structural damage by minimizing the demand for main structural elements through the use of passive energy dissipation devices, particularly, in the form of Yielding Restrained Braces (YRBs) or Inline Friction Dampers (IFDs). Friction dampers dissipate energy through friction and emerge due to the sliding of two solid elements relative to one another. For instance, solid friction can control earthquake-induced vibration, another example on a smaller scale is automotive brakes which dissipate the kinetic energy of motion. The friction damper (brake) is commonly used to extract kinetic energy from a moving body, when a major earthquake occurs, conventional braces buckle which leads to unsymmetrical hysteretic behaviour and loss of stiffness, while the friction damper slips at a predetermined load before yielding occurs in members of a frame, which dissipate a major part of energy. It saves the initial cost of a new construction or retrofitting of an existing building, where the dampers provide a very high energy dissipation.
Even though damping devices can provide supplemental damping to mitigate vibration in buildings due to wind or earthquake effects, integrating them in the design is not often straightforward. For example, building design with inline friction dampers is not directly provided in the Canadian code. The NBCC 2015 contains recommendations for supplemental energy dissipation in general, but no specific provisions are available for friction dampers. In the National Building Code of Canada (2015), the minimum earthquake lateral force in a Seismic Force Resisting System(s) (SFRS) is divided by a reduction factor. This factor, known as the response modification factor, can be calculated by multiplying the overstrength factor (Ro) and the ductility-related force modification factor (Rd). As the 2015 NBCC does not provide the overstrength factor (Ro) and the ductility factor (Rd) for friction-damped systems, engineers usually work with the factor for the closest equivalent system, ductile buckling-restrained braced (BRB) frames (Rd=4, Ro=1.2). This practice is already conservative in nature mainly because the non-damage-based modification factor for a Yielding Restrained Braced (YRB) system has been found to be substantially higher, and because the system can be tested at Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) ground motion forces and displacement in contrast to the equivalent systems that cannot avoid uncertainty in their actual behavior.
The objectives of the present research are to (i) investigate the life safety performance of different concrete moment resisting frames (CMRFs) considering supplemental damping to estimate seismic response factors, (ii) evaluate seismic design parameters of concrete moment resisting frames (CMRFs) equipped with different energy dissipation systems to understand the relative performance of YRBs, (iii) collaborate experimental work with simulation to investigate dynamic performance and reliability of YRBs under real earthquakes, (iv) develop a set of guidelines for the use of yielding restrained braces in concrete frame buildings.
In order to achieve the above goals, a set of buildings with concrete moment resisting frames have been considered. These frames were designed for high seismic locations in Canada and the equivalent locations in the US. The design YRB systems for these frames have been adapted from ASCE/FEMA guidelines and contextualized for Canada. The results show that such an approach could be beneficial for designing buildings with inline friction dampers and could provide not only cost savings but also, enhanced seismic safety and maintainability.

Divisions:Concordia University > Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science > Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering
Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Authors:Naghshineh, Ali
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:Ph. D.
Program:Civil Engineering
Date:18 October 2021
Thesis Supervisor(s):Bagchi, Ashutosh
Keywords:Yielding Restrained Brace, Seismic, Ductility, Response Modification Factor, Reinforced Concrete, Energy Dissipation Devices, Performance-based design, Damping
ID Code:989976
Deposited By: ALI NAGHSHINEH
Deposited On:16 Jun 2022 14:34
Last Modified:16 Jun 2022 14:34

References:

AASHTO (2002), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
ACI 318-19. (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, ACI Committee 318.
Agrawal, A. K., and Yang, J. N. (2000). A semi-active electromagnetic friction damper for response control of structures, Structures Congress, 8-10, Philadelphia, PA. American Society of Civil Engineers, DOI: 10.1061/40492(2000)6.
Aiken, L. D., and Kelly, J. M. (1990). Earthquake simulator testing and analytical studies of two energy-absorbing systems for multistory structures, UCB/EERC-90/03, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
Aiken, L.D., Nims, D.K., and Kelly, J.M. (1992). Comparative study of four passive energy dissipation system, Bulletein of the New Zealand national society for earthquake engineering, Vol.25, No.3, PP.175-192.
Akiyama, H. (2000). Evaluation of fractural mode of failure in steel structures following Kobe lessons, Journal of Constructional Research, No. 55, 211-227.
Alam, M. S., Moni, M., and Tesfamariam, S. (2012). Seismic overstrength and ductility of concrete buildings reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloy rebar, Engineering Structures, 34, 8–20.
ANSI/AISC 341-16. (2016). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois 60601.
ANSI/AISC 360-05. (2005). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois 60601.
ASCE/SEI 41-17. (2017). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
ASCE/SEI 7-05. (2005). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers.
ASCE/SEI 7-10. (2010). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers.
ASCE/SEI 7-16. (2016). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Asgarian, B., and Shokrgozar, H. R. (2009). BRBF response modification factor, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(2), 290–298.
ATC 3-06. (1978). Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings, ATC publication, V.Series, United States. National Bureau of Standards. Special publication, 510.
ATC 58-1. (2003). Sponsored workshop on communicating earthquake risk, Applied Technology Council, www.ATCouncil.org.
ATC 72-1. (2019). Nonlinear modeling of tall buildings, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, https://peer.berkeley.edu/peeratc-72-1-report-released-about-nonlinear-modeling-tall-buildings.
ATC. (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Volume 1, ATC-40 Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
ATC-19. (1995). Structural response modification factors, Applied Technology Council.
ATC-34. (1995). A critical review of current approaches to earthquake-resistant design, Applied Technology Council, NCEER Project No. 92-4601.
Atkinson, G.M., Adams J. (2013). Ground motion prediction equations for application to the 2015 Canadian national seismic hazard maps, Can. J. Civ. Eng., 40, 988- 998.
Baber, T. T., and Noori, M. N. (1986). Modeling general hysteresis behaviour and random vibration applications, Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design, 108 (4) pp. 411–420.
Baber, T. T., Noori, M. N. (1985). Random Vibration of Degrading, Pinching Systems, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 111, 1010–1026, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:8(1010).
Baker J.W. (2007). Correlation of ground motion intensity parameters used for predicting structural and geotechnical response, Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-45134-5.
Baker, J.W. (2011). Conditional Mean Spectrum: Tool for Ground-Motion Selection, J. Struct. Eng., 137, 322–331, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000215.
Calvi, G., Priestley, M. J. N., Kowalsky, M. J. (2013). Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Bridges. Structural Engineering International, 23, 112-121. doi: 10.2749/101686613X134391 49157399.
Chang, C., Pall, A., Jason, J. C., and Louie, S. E. (2006). The Use of friction dampers for seismic retrofit of the Monterey County Government Center, In Proc., 8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, Paper 951.
Chen, C., and Chen, G. (2001). A High Efficiency Control Logic for Semi-Active Friction Dampers, Structures 2001, American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, D.C., United States, 1–11.
Chen, M. C. (2018). Enhanced Seismic Resiliency for Buildings via Base Isolation, PhD Dissertation, San Diego, CA: University of California, San Diego. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/94v8d49h.
Chopra, A.K. (2012). Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Ciampi, V., De Angelis, M., and Paolacci, F. (1995). Design of yielding or friction-based dissipative bracings for seismic protection of buildings, Engineering Structures, 17(5), 381-391.
Colajanni, P., and Papia, M. (1997). Hysteretic behaviour characterization of friction-damped braced frames, Journal of structural engineering, 123(8), PP.1020-1028.
Constantinou M.C., Kalpakidis I., Filiatrault A., Lay R.A.E. (2011). LRFD-Based Analysis and Design Procedures for Bridge Bearings and Seismic Isolators, MCEER-11-0004, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo: NY.
Constantinou, M., Mokha, A., Reinhorn, A. (1990). Teflon Bearings in Base Isolation II: Modeling, Journal of Structural Engineering, 116, 455–474, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:2(455).
Constantinou, M., Soong, T., Dargush, G. (1998). Passive Energy Dissipation Systems for Structural Design and Retrofit, MCEER Monograph No. 1, University at Buffalo, ISBN 0-9656682-1-5.
Cordova, P. P., Deierlein, G. G., Mehanny, S. S. F., and Cornell, C. A. (2000). Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure, 2nd U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan,187–206.
CSA (2019). Design of concrete structures, CSA A23.3-19, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ontario.
CSI, C. (2015). SAP2000 (version 20) Integrated Solution for Structural Analysis and Design – CSI Analysis Reference Manual, Computers and Structures, California, USA.
CSI. (2016). Integrated Building Design Software, ETABS, CSI Analysis Reference Manual, Computers and Structures, Inc., California, USA, Retrieved from https://www.csiamerica.com/products/etabs.
Davalos, J. F., Chen, A., Ray, I., and Levan, J. R. (2012). Comprehensive study on using externally bonded FRP composites for the rehabilitation of reinforced concrete t-beam bridges, Journal of Infrastructure Systems (ASCE), Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 89–102.
Deierlein, G.G., Reinhorn, A.M., Willford, M.R. (2010). Nonlinear structural analysis for seismic design, NEHRP seismic design technical brief, 4, 1–36.
Deierlein, G.G., Reinhorn, A.M., Willford, M.R. (2010). Nonlinear structural analysis for seismic design. NEHRP seismic design technical brief 4, 1–36.
Earthquake Engineering Research institute (EERI, 2020), www.eeri.org.
Elwood K.J., Eberhard M.O. (2006). Effective Stiffness of Reinforced Concrete Columns, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), Research Digest No.2006-1.
Elwood, K.J., Matamoros, A.B., Wallace, J.W., Lehman, D.E., Heintz, J.A., Mitchell, A.D., Moore, M.A., Valley, M.T., Lowes, L.N., Comartin, C.D., Moehle, J.P. (2007). Update to ASCE/SEI 41 Concrete Provisions, Earthquake Spectra, 23, 493–523.
FEMA 273. (1997). NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Developed by the Building Seismic Safety Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Report No. FEMA 273), Washington, D.C.
FEMA 302. (1997). NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington.
FEMA 349. (2000). Action Plan for Performance Based Seismic Design, Earthquake engineering research institute.
FEMA 356. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
FEMA 420. (2009). Engineering Guideline for Incremental Seismic Rehabilitation, Risk Management Series.
FEMA 450. (2000). Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, NEHRP Federal Emergency Management Agency, Part 1: Provisions.
FEMA 451. (2006). Design methods, NEHRP Federal Emergency Management Agency, Building Seismic Safety Council.
FEMA P-1050-1. (2015). Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, Volume I: Part 1 Provisions.
FEMA P-2082. (2020). Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, Volume I: Part 1 Provisions.
FEMA P58-1. (2012). Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Volume 1 - Methodology, Prepared by Applied Technology Council (ATC), Redwood City, USA.
FEMA P695. (2009). Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
FEMA-440. (2005). Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
FEMA-461. (2007). Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Non-structural Components, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Feng, M. Q., Shinozuka, M., Fujii, S. (1993). Friction controllable sliding isolation system, J. Eng. Mechanics. 9, 1845–1864.
Fisco, N.R., and Adeli, H. (2011). Smart Structures: Part I-Active and Semi-Active Control, Scientia Iranica 18 (3): 275–284. doi:10.1016/j.scient.2011.05.034.
Foliente, G. (1993). Stochastic dynamic response of wood structural systems, Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Galindo, O., Frazao, R., Pastor, C., Coronado, G., and Gonzales, D. (2019a). Supplemental Damping for the seismic retrofit of 8-storey RC Hotel building in the Mexican Pacific using Yielding Restrained Braces – part A, Comparison of alternatives, 12th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, 8.
Galindo, O., Frazao, R., Pastor, C., Coronado, G., and Gonzales, D. (2019b). Supplemental Damping for the seismic retrofit of 8-storey RC Hotel building in the Mexican Pacific using Yielding Restrained Braces – part B, Methodology, 12th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, 8.
Gavin, H.P., Dickinson, B.W. (2011). Generation of Uniform-Hazard Earthquake Ground Motions, J. Struct. Eng., 137, 423–432.
Gordaninejad, F., Ray, A. D., Wang, H. (1994). Use of hybrid dampers for vibration control of structures, Proceedings of the third US-Japan Workshop on Earthquake Protective Systems for Bridges, 3-15, 3-29.
Gupta, A.K. (1990). Response spectrum method in seismic analysis and design of structures, New directions in civil engineering, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston.
Haider, J.R., & Kim, U. (2012). A parametric approach for the optimization of passive friction dampers, Structure Congress, ASCE, 1673-1684.
Hamburger, R.O., and Holmes, W.T. (1998). Vision Statement: EERI/FEMA Performance-based Seismic Engineering Project, Background Document for the EERI/FEMA Action Plan, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
Hamed, E., Chang, Z.T., Rabinovitch, O. (2014). Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Arches with Externally Bonded Composite Materials: Testing and Analysis, Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, ISSN 1090-0268/04014031(15).
Haselton, C.B., Liel, A.B., Lange, S.T., Deierlein, G.G. (2007). Beam-Column Element Model Calibrated for Predicting Flexural Response Leading to Global Collapse of RC Frame Buildings, PEER Report No. 2007, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
https://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/OpenSees_User
Humar, J. (2015). Background to some of the seismic design provisions of the 2015 National Building Code of Canada, Journal of civil engineering, Vol.42, pp.940–952.
Humar, J., and Mahgoub, M.A. (2003). Determination of seismic design forces by equivalent static load method, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 30: 287–307.
Ikhouane, F., Mañosa, V., Rodellar, J. (2007). Dynamic properties of the hysteretic Bouc-Wen model, Systems & Control Letters, 56, 197–205.
ISIS Canada Educational Module. (2004), www.isiscanada.com.
Kasai, K. (2013). Seismic Performance of Building Protective Systems: Evaluations from Full-Scale Lab Tests and Actual Earthquake Observations, Structural Engineering Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology, JAPAN.
Kasai, K., Ooki, Y., Motoyui, S., Takeuchi, T., and Sato, E. (2007). E-Defense Tests on Full-Scale Steel Buildings: Part 1 – Experiments Using Dampers and Isolators, Research Frontiers at Structures Congress 2007 May 16-19, 2007, Long Beach, California: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Kelly, J. M. (1999). The role of damping in seismic isolation, Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamic, 28, 3-20.
Kelly, J. M., Skinner, R. I., Heine, A. J., (1972). Mechanisms of energy absorption in special devices for use in earthquake resistant structures, Bulletin of N.Z. Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 5 No. 3.
Kiran, A. R., Agrawal, M. K., and Reddy, G. R. (2016). Seismic retrofitting of a process column using friction dampers, Procedia Eng., 144, 1356-1363.
Ko, E., and Field, C. (1988), The Unbonded Brace™: From Research to Californian Practice, Technology.
Kobori, T., Takahashi, M., Nasu, T., Niwa, N., Ogasawara, K. (1993). Seismic response-controlled structure with active variable stiffness system, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22, 925–941.
Krawinkler, H. (1997). A framework for performance-based earthquake resistive design, EERC CUREe Symposium in Honor of Vitelmo V. Bertero, Berkeley, Caljfornia.
Krawinkler, H., and Seneviratna, G. D. P. K. (1998). Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation, Engineering Structures, 20(4–6), 452–464.
Krawinkler, H., Nassar, A. A. (1992). Nonlinear Seismic Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, CRC Press, ISBN9780429176753.
Law, S.S., Wu, Z.M., Chan, S.L. (2006). Analytical model of a slotted bolted connection element and its behaviour under dynamic load. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 292, 777–787, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.09.028.
Lawson, R. S., Vance, V. and Krawinkler, H. (1994). Nonlinear static pushover analysis - why, when and how? Proc. 5th US Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 1, Chicago, IL, 283-292.
Lawsson, R. S., Vance, V., and Krawinkler, H. (1994). Nonlinear static pushover analysis- Why, When, and How, Earthquake Engineering, Chicago, 1, 283–292.
Lignos, D. G., Krawinkler, H., and Whittaker, A. S. (2011). “Prediction and validation of sideway collapse of two scale models of a 4-storey steel moment frame.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics (EESD), 40(7), 807–825.
Logan Anthony Couch. (2020). Resilience and response of the dual system moment frame and braced frame with friction damper, Master of Science in Civil Engineering in the Lyles College of Engineering California State University, Fresno.
López-Almansa, F., Castro-Medina, J.C., Oller, S. (2012). A numerical model of the structural behaviour of buckling-restrained braces, Engineering Structures 41, 108–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.045.
Lou, J. Y. K., Lutes, L. D., and Li, J. J. (1994). Active tuned liquid damper for structural control, Proc. of the 1st World Conference on Structural Control, Los Angeles, CA, TP1: 70-9.
Lukkunaprasit, P., Wanitkorkul, A., and Filiatrault, A. (2004). Performance deterioration of slotted-bolted connection due to bolt impact and remedy by restrainers, Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
Makkar, C., Dixon, W.E., Sawyer, W.G., Hu, G. (2005). A new continuously differentiable friction model for control systems design, Presented at the 2005 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, IEEE, Monterey, CA, pp. 600–605. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM.2005.1511048.
Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., Fenves, G. L. (2006). OpenSees command language manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center.
McKenna, F. (1997). Objetc-oriented finite element programming: frameworks for analysis, algorithms and parallel computing, PhD thesis, Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkley, Ca.
McKenna, F., Fenves, G., Scott, M. (2013). Computer Program OpenSees: Open system for earthquake engineering simulation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
McMahon, S., and Makris, N. (1997). Large-scale ER-damper for seismic protection of bridges, Proc. Structures Congress, 1451–1455.
Miranda, E. (1991). Evaluation of seismic performance of a ten story RC building during the whittier narrows earthquake, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Miranda, E., and Bertero, V. V. (1994). Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake‐Resistant Design, Earthquake Spectra, 10(2), 357–379.
Moni, M., Moradi, S., and Alam, M. S. (2016). Response modification factors for steel buckling restrained braced frames designed as per the 2010 National Building Code of Canada, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 43(8), 702–715.
Morgan, T., A. (2007). “The use of innovative base isolation systems to achieve complex seismic performance objectives.” Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Mousavi Azad Kasmaei, S. (2011). Seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete shear wall seismic force resisting systems, Library and Archives Canada, Bibliothèque et Archives Canada, Ottawa.
Mualla, I.H., Belev, B. (2002). Performance of steel frames with a new friction damper device under earthquake excitation, Engineering Structures, 24, 365–371, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00102-X.
Naghshineh, A., Kassem, A., Pilorge, A. G., Galindo, O. R., and Bagchi, A. (2018). Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings Equipped with Friction Dampers, Structures Congress 2018, American Society of Civil Engineers, Fort Worth, Texas, 94–101.
NBCC. (2015). National Research Council of Canada. National Building Code of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
NBC. (2017). National Research Council of Canada, Structural Commentaries User’s Guide, Part 4 of Division B, Ottawa, ON.
Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. (1978). Development of criteria for earthquake resistant design, Report NUREGICR-0098, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 49 pp.
Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. (1982). Earthquake Spectra and Design, EERI Monograph, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California.
Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. (1982). Earthquake Spectra and Design, EERI Monograph, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California, 103 pp.
Newmark, N.M. and Rosenblueth, E. (1971). Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 640 pp.
Nikoukalam, M.T., Mirghaderi, S.R., Dolatshahi, K.M. (2017). Shear slotted bolted connection. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 26, e1313, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1313.
Nims, D. K., Richter, P.J., Bachman, R.E. (1993). Use of the energy dissipating restraint for seismic hazard mitigation, Earthquake spectra, Vol.9. No.3, 476-489.
OSHPD and SEAOC (2020). Seismic design maps. Structural Engineers Association of California’s (SEAOC). https://seismicmaps.org.
Pall, A. (1979). Limited slip bolted joints a device to control the seismic response of large panel structures, Ph.D. thesis, Concordia university, Montreal, Canada.
Pall, A. S., and Pall, R. (1996). Friction dampers for seismic control of buildings a Canadian experience, 11WCEE, 497.
Pall, S., & Marsh, C., (1982). Response of friction damped braced frames, Journal of structural engineering, ASCE, 108, ST6.
Patil, C.S., Patil, V. B., Kharmale, S. B. (2015). Performance-based plastic design of a high-rise moment resisting frame with friction dampers, Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures, 152, 73-82.
Paulay T., and Priestley M. J. N. (1992). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Paulay, T. (1988). Seismic Design in Reinforced Concrete- the State of the Art in New Zealand, Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 21(3), 208-232.
PEER Ground Motion Database, PEER Center, https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu.
Popov, E.P., Grigorian, C.E., Yang, T. S., (1995). Developments in seismic structural analysis and design. Engineering Structures, 17, 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(94)00006-F.
Quaketek Inc. (2016). Seismic design, Available: https://www.quaketek.com.
Risk and Resilience Mesurement Committee (2019). Resilience-Based Performance: Next Generation Guidelines for Buildings and Lifeline Standards, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784415276.
Roberts, J., and Spanos, P. (1990). Random vibration and statistical linearization, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Roik, K., Dorka, U., Dechent, P. (1988). Vibration control of structures under earthquake loading by three-stage friction-grip elements, Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn., 16, 501–521, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290160404.
Saatcioglu, M., Palermo, D., Ghobarah, A., Mitchell, D., Simpson, R., Adebar, P., Tremblay, R., Ventura, C., and Hong, H. (2013). Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the 27 February 2010 Maule (Chile) earthquake, Journal of civil Engineering, NRC, 40: PP.693–710.
Samani, H. R., Mirtaheri, M., and Zandi, A, P. (2015). Experimental and Numerical Study of a New Adjustable Frictional Damper, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 112: 354–362. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.05.019.
Santayana, G. (1917). Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it, The Life of Reason or Phases of Human Progress, New York.
Sarjou, P.H., Shabakhty, N. (2017). Effect of the Improved Pall Friction Damper on the Seismic Response of Steel Frames, 7, 5.
SEAOC. (1995). Vision 2000, A framework for performance-based engineering, Sacramento, CA, Structural Engineers Association of California.
SeismoSoft. (2014). SeismoStruct-User Manual For version 7.0, www.seismosoft.com, Pavia, Italy.
SENSRA (2021), Structural monitoring solutions, https://sensr.com.
Sextro, W. (2007). Dynamical contact problems with friction: models, methods, experiments and applications, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, New York.
Skinner, R. I., Kelly, J. M., Heine, A. J. (1975). Hysteretic dampers for earthquake-resistant structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 3, 287–296, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290030307.
Soli, B., Baerwald, D., Krebs, P., and Pall, R. (2004). Friction dampers for seismic control of ambulatory care center, sharp memorial hospital, San Diego, CA, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, No. 1953.
Soong, T. T., and Dargush, G. F. (1999). Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control, Boca Raton: Structural Engineering Handbook, CRC Press LLC, 1–28.
Soong, T. T., and G. F. Dargush. (1998). Passive energy dissipation systems for structural design and retrofit, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). http://mceer.eng.buffalo.edu.
Soong, T. T., and Spencer, B. F. (2002). Supplemental Energy Dissipation: State-of-the-Art and State-of-the-Practice, Engineering Structures 24 (3): 243–259. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00092-X.
Su, L., Ahmadi, G., Tadjbakhsh, I. G. (1989). Comparative Study of Base Isolation Systems, Journal of Engineering Mechanics 115, 1976–1992. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:9(1976).
Sullivan, T., J. Calvi, G., M. (2013). Developments in the field of displacement-based seismic assessment, IUSS Press: Pavia, Italy, 2013.
Sultana, P., and Youssef, M. A. (2016). Seismic performance of steel moment resisting frames utilizing superelastic shape memory alloys, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 125, 239–251.
Symans, M. D., and Constantinou, M. C. (1997). Semi-active control systems for seismic protection of structures: a state-of-the-art review, Eng. Struct. 21, 469-487.
Taylor devices inc. (2020). Damper-Design-Manual-ThirdEdition.pdf.
Tehrani, F. M. (1990). “Review of Manjil 1990 Earthquake damages of Buildings in Gilan and Zanjan.” [in Persian]. Omran, Magazine of Civil Engineering Students of the Sharif University of Technology. 2, 5-7.
Tehrani, F.M., Nazari, M., Naghshineh, A., (2020). Role of Seismic Isolation and Protection Devices in Enhancing Structural Resilience, EMI ORC MOP Part III Chapter 21.
Tena-Colunga, A. (1997). Mathematical modelling of the ADAS energy dissipation device, Engineering Structures, 19, 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00165-X.
Tirca, L. (2009). A simple approach for the seismic retrofit of buildings with staggered friction dampers, Protection of Historical Buildings: Proceedings of the International Conference on Protection of Historical Buildings, PROHITECH 09, Rome, Italy, 21-24 june 2009: PROHITECH 09, Vol. 1, 2009, ISBN 978-0-415-55804-4, p. 761-767, 761–767.
Tirca, L., Serban, O., Tremblay, R., Jiang, Y., and Chen, L. (2018). Seismic Design, Analysis and Testing of a Friction Steel Braced Frame System for Multi-Storey Buildings in Vancouver, Key Engineering Materials, 763, 1077–1086.
Tsai, K. C., Chen, H. W., Hong, C. P., and Su, Y. E. (1993). Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction, Earthquake Spectra, 9(3), 505-528.
Turek, M., Ventura, C.E., Thibert, K. (2008). Dynamic Characteristics of Tall Buildings in Vancouver, Canada, Presented at the Structures Congress 2008, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1061/41016(314)116.
Uang, C.M., and Bertero, V. V., (1988). Use of Energy as a Design Criterion in Earthquake-Resistant Design, Technical Report UCB/EERC-88/18, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Vail, C., Hubbell, J. (2003). Structural Upgrade of the Boeing Commercial Airplane Factory at Everett, Washington, Proceedings, Structures Congress & Exposition, Seattle, WA, Paper # 000529.
Wen, Y.K. (1980). Equivalent Linearization for Hysteretic Systems Under Random Excitation, J. Appl. Mech., 47, 150, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3153594.
Whittaker, A. S., Bertero, V. V., Thompson, C. L., and Alonso, L. J. (1991). Seismic testing of steel plate energy dissipation devices, Earthquake spectra, vol.7, No.4.
Whittaker, A., Hart, G., Rojahn, C. (1999). Seismic Response Modification Factors. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125, 438–444, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733 9445(1999)125:4(438).
Whittaker, A.S., Uang, C.M., and Bertero V.V. (1987). Earthquake simulation tests and associated studies of a 0.3-scale model of a six-story eccentrically braces steel structure, Earthquake engineering research center, Report No. UCB/EERC-87/02, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Yamamoto, M., Sone, T. (2014). Behaviour of active mass damper (AMD) installed in high-rise building during 2011 earthquake off Pacific coast of Tohoku and verification of regenerating system of AMD based on monitoring, Structural Control and Health Monitoring 21, 634–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1590.
Yanik, A., and Aldemir, U. (2019). A Short Review on the Active Control Approaches in Earthquake Engineering at the Last 10 Years (2008-2018). International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA 111–118, DOI: 10.7763/IJET. 2019.V11.1132.
Yousuf, M., and Bagchi, A. (2009). Seismic design and performance evaluation of steel-frame buildings designed using the 2005 National building code of Canada, Journal of civil Engineering, NRC, 36: PP.280–294.
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads per month over past year

Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
- Research related to the current document (at the CORE website)
Back to top Back to top