Neugebauer, Tomasz and MacDonald, Corina and Tayler, Felicity (2012) Artexte metadata conversion to EPrints: adaptation of digital repository software to visual and media arts documentation. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 11 (4). pp. 263-277. ISSN 1432-5012
|PDF - Accepted Version|
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00799-011-0077-5
Purpose: The following research questions structured our analysis: Does an open access institutional repository model respond to the needs of a non-academic documentation centre? Is EPrints software a good match to support the needs of the existing metadata describing Artexte's collection? What are the customizations required to accommodate existing Artexte metadata using EPrints?
Methods: We exported the existing metadata schema and sample data in Artexte’s three databases, performed a manual evaluation of metadata quality and compared the 49 Artexte fields to those available within the EPrints schema.
Results: We identify the metadata elements that mapped by default without the need for customization or modification and those which would need to be added to EPrints using configuration files. We also identify the custom software development to accommodate Artexte metadata using EPrints: the bilingual controlled vocabulary demands an extension of the EPrints subject taxonomy model with thesaurus semantic relationships.
Conclusions: Comparing Artexte and EPrints metadata schemas, we found that 15 out of 49 fields mapped by default without need for modification, 25 fields would need to be added to EPrints configuration files and 1 field will be removed during the migration. With only 8 fields requiring some special attention, we conclude that EPrints is suitable to the needs of Artexte's bibliographic data management.
|Divisions:||Concordia University > Libraries|
|Authors:||Neugebauer, Tomasz and MacDonald, Corina and Tayler, Felicity|
|Journal or Publication:||International Journal on Digital Libraries|
|Keywords:||Metadata, EPrints, Art Documentation, Open Access|
|Deposited By:||TOMASZ NEUGEBAUER|
|Deposited On:||27 Jan 2012 14:08|
|Last Modified:||31 Jan 2013 01:38|
|Additional Information:||The final publication is available at www.springerlink.com|
1. Averkamp S, Lee J (2009) Repurposing ProQuest Metadata for Batch Ingesting ETDs into an Institutional Repository. code4lib journal http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/1647. Accessed 03 June 2010.
2. Bradley J, Johnstone L (1994) “Introduction”. Sightlines: Reading Contemporary Canadian Art. Montreal: Artextes editions, 1994.
3. Bruce TR, Hillman D (2004) Metadata in Practice, Chap. The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting. pp. 238-256. ALA Editions, Chicago.
4. Brody T, Harnad S, Carr L. (2006) Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact. Journal of the American Association for Information Science and Technology 57(8):1060-1072. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20373
5. Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002). http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml. Accessed 15 August 2011
6. Corrado EM (2005) The Importance of Open Access, Open Source, and Open Standards for Libraries. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. Spring 2005. http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/05-spring/article2.html. Accessed 8 August 2011
7. Cruz, D (2006) Evaluation criteria for free/open source software products based on project analysis. Software Process Improvement and Practice 11(2): 107 DOI: 10.1002/spip.257
8. Davis PM (2010) Does Open Access Lead to Increased Readership and Citations? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Articles Published in APS Journals. The Physiologist 53(6):197-201. http://www.the-aps.org/publications/tphys/2010html/December/open_access.htm . Accessed 11 August 2011
9. Davis PM, Lewenstein BV, Simon DH, Booth JG, Connolly MJL (2008) Open access publishing, article downloads and citations: randomised trial. BMJ 337: a568. DOI:10.1136/bmj.a568
10. Fay E (2010) Repository Software Comparison: Building Digital Library Infrastructure at LSE. Ariadne http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue64/fay/. Accessed 8 August 2011
11. Floyd, R (2009) Automated Electronic Thesis and Dissertations Ingest. https://wiki.dlib.indiana.edu/display/IUSW/Automated+Electronic+Thesis+and+Dissertations+Ingest (). Accessed 26 May 2011.
12. Gentil-Beccot A, Mele S, Brooks TC (2009) Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics. Scientometrics. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0111-1
13. Gonçalves MA, Fox EA, Watson LT (2008) Towards a digital library theory: a formal digital library ontology. Int J Digit Libr 8:91-114 DOI: 10.1007/s00799-008-0033-1
14. Gray A (2009) Institutional Repositories for Creative and Applied Arts Research: The Kultur Project. Ariadne 60 http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue60/gray/. Accessed 03 June 2010.
15. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (2009) Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2011
16. International Association of Research Institutes in the History of Art (2008) RIHA Resolution on Copyright. http://www.riha-institutes.org/resolutioncopyright.html. Accessed 15 August 2011.
17. Khoo M, Hall C (2010) Merging metadata: a sociotechnical study of crosswalking and interoperability. JCDL '10 Proceedings of the 10th annual joint conference on Digital libraries. Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. June 21–25, 2010. DOI: 10.1145/1816123.1816180
18. Latour J, Tayler F (2009) Contemporary glocal: Positioning a national mandate within a global context. Art Libraries Journal 34(1):40-45.
19. Léger D (2006) Le Centre d’information Artexte : un mandat, et un parcours, atypiques. Essays in the History of Art Librarianship in Canada. ARLIS Canada. http://www.arliscanada.ca/hal/. Accessed 03 June 2010.
20. Lawrence S (2001) Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature 411(521). DOI:10.1038/35079151
21. Marill JL, Luczak EC (2009) Evaluation of Digital Repository Software at the National Library of Medicine. D-Lib Magazine 15(5/6) http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may09/marill/05marill.html. Accessed 9 August 2011
22. McKay D, Shukla P, Hunt R, Cunningham SJ (2004) Enhanced browsing in digital libraries: three new approaches to browsing in Greenstone. Int J Digit Libr 4:283–297. DOI: 10.1007/s00799-004-0088-6
23. Morisio M, Seaman CB, Basili VR, Parra AT, Kraft SE, Condon SE (2002) COTS-based software development: Processes and open issues. The Journal of Systems and Software 61:189–199 DOI:10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00147-9
24. Ochoa X, Duval E (2009) Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories. Int J Digit Libr 10:67-91 DOI: 10.1007/s00799-009-0054-4
25. Open Access Directory (2011) Declarations in support of OA. http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Declarations_in_support_of_OA. Accessed 11 August 2011.
26. Open Access Directory (2011) Statements by learned societies and professional associations http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Statements_by_learned_societies_and_professional_associations. Accessed 11 August 2011.
27. Repository Support Project (2010) Repository Software Survey (November 2010). http://www.rsp.ac.uk/documents/Repository-Software-Survey-2010-11.pdf. Accessed 4 August 2011
28. Rhyno, A (2004) Using Open Source Systems for Digital Libraries. Westport, Conn, London : Libraries Unlimited.
29. Sale A (2005) The Key Things to Know. University of Tasmania Eprints Repository. http://eprints.utas.edu.au/223/1/NZ_Workshop_PDF.pdf. Accessed 5 August 2011
30. Sheppard V (2009) Metadata Report. JISC. http://kultur.EPrints.org/Metadata%20report%20Final.pdf. Accessed 03 June 2010.
31. Singh S, Pandita N (2005) Building the open access self-archiving repository for the bio-medical sciences at National Informatics Centre. In: National Convention of Medical Library Association of India, 07-09 Nov 2005, Bangalore, India. http://openmed.nic.in/1108/. Accessed 11 August 2011
32. Singh SK, Witt M, Dorothea S (2010) A Comparative Analysis of Institutional Repository Software. Fifth International Conference on Open Repositories. Madrid, Spain, July 2010. http://or2010.fecyt.es/Resources/documentos/GSabstracts/AComparativeAnalysisInstitutionalRepositorySoftware.pdf. Accessed 4 August 2011
33. University of Southampton (2011) EPrints - Digital Repository Software http://www.eprints.org/software. Accessed 3 June 2010
34. University of Southampton (2011) Registry of Open Access Repositories (Browse by Repository Software). http://roar.eprints.org/view/software/. Accessed 10 August 2011
35. Walsh MP (2010) Batch Loading Collections into DSpace: Using Perl Scripts for Automation and Quality Control. Information Technology and Libraries 29(3): 117-127 http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/lita/ital/292010/2903sep/walsh_pdf.cfm. Accessed 26 June 2011.
36. Wyles, R (2006) Technical Evaluation of selected Open Source Repository Solutions. Open Access Repositories in New Zealand (OARINZ) project, Christchurch Polytechnic Institute of Technology, v1.3, 13 September 2006 http://dlynx.rhodes.edu/jspui/bitstream/10267/30/1/Repository_Evaluation_Document_NZ.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2011
Repository Staff Only: item control page