Corporate Social Actions and Reputation: From Doing Good to Looking Good


Corporate Social Actions and Reputation: From Doing Good to Looking Good

Tetrault Sirsly, Carol-Ann (2012) Corporate Social Actions and Reputation: From Doing Good to Looking Good. PhD thesis, Concordia University.

PDF - Accepted Version


While corporate social responsibility (CSR) has garnered the attention of scholars over the past three decades, most attention has been focused on a link to financial performance. Grounded in stakeholder theory and a resource-based view of the firm considering the cospecialized intangible assets of CSR and reputation, this research explores the evolution of corporate social actions and firm reputation over time. We draw on data from the KLD database on corporate social actions and concerns, and on the Fortune most-admired company database to examine the relationship between corporate social behaviour and reputation over time.
In the thesis, we argue that starting with the broad premise that any corporate social action or gesture can initially enhance corporate reputation, the firm is then both encouraged and also expected to go further. Accordingly, we propose subsequent actions are needed to meet stakeholder expectations to be able to improve or at least sustain firm reputation. We find that over the timeframe of our study that corporate social actions do experience the predicted positive linear growth.
Drawing on a sample of 285 major US firms and a 2002-2006 time frame to provide a 1425 firm year panel, we find corporate social actions to be strongly related to corporate reputation, while the change in corporate social actions also predicts a change in corporate reputation. We also found support for the hypothesis that corporate social actions directed to technical stakeholders have the most significant impact on firm reputation. We do not however find the expected influence of concerns over corporate social actions directed to institutional stakeholders on firm reputation, leading to the intriguing question: why not?
We provide detailed illustrations with five of the sampled firms and interpret their CSR-reputation relationships. These findings expand our understanding of the effect of the change over time in corporate social actions and the ensuing effect on corporate reputation. We extend the applicability of our findings to management, discuss limitations and propose future research directions.

Divisions:Concordia University > John Molson School of Business > Management
Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Authors:Tetrault Sirsly, Carol-Ann
Institution:Concordia University
Degree Name:Ph. D.
Program:Business Administration (Management specialization)
Date:02 April 2012
Thesis Supervisor(s):Molz, Rick
Keywords:corporate social responsibility, corporate reputation, longitudinal
ID Code:973781
Deposited On:20 Jun 2012 13:42
Last Modified:15 Nov 2012 16:39
Ackoff, R. L. 1970. A Concept of Corporate Planning, New York: Wiley.
Adler, P.S. & Kwon, S.W. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27: 17-40.
Aguilera, R.V., Rupp, D.E., Williams, C.A. & Ganapathi, J. 2007. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32: 836-863.

Aldag, R.J. & Bartol, K.M. 1978. Empirical studies of corporate social performance and policy: A survey of problems and results. Research in corporate social performance and policy, L.E. Preston (ed.), 1: 165-199.
Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Allison, G. T. 1971. The Essence of Decision, Second edition (1999) with P. Zelikow, New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Andrews, K. J. 1971. The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Second edition (1980), USA: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
Ang, S.H. & Wight, A-M. 2009 Building intangible resources: The stickiness of reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 12: 21-32.
Ansoff, H. I. 1965. Corporate Strategy, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Bagnoli, M. & Watts, S. 2003. Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 12: 419-445.

Bansal, P. 2005. Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 197-218.

Barnard, C. I. 1938. The Functions of the Executive, 30th anniversary edition (1968), Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
Barnea, A. & Rubin, A. 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97: 71-86.

Barnett, M.L., Jermier, J.M., & Lafferty, B.A. 2006. Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9: 26-38.

Barnett, M.L. 2007. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32: 794-816.

Barney, J.B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.

Barney, J.B. 2001. Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic
management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 41-56.

Baron, D.P. 2001. Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10: 7-45.

Bartels, R. & Goodhew, J. 1981. The robustness of the Durbin-Watson Test. The Review of Economics & Statistics, 63: 136-139.

Basdeo, D.K., Smith, K.G., Grimm, C.M., Rindova, V.P. & Derfus, P.J. 2006. The impact of market actions on firm reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 1205-1219.
Bear, S., Rahman, N. & Post, C. 2010. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97: 207-221.
Bener, M. & Glaister, K.W. 2010. Determinants of performance in international joint ventures. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3: 188-214.
Bentein, K., Vandenberg, R., Vandenberghe, C. & Stinglhamber, F. 2005. The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 468-482.
Bentler, P.M. 1988 Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 88: 588-606.
Bentler, P.M. 2004. EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual, Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
Bergh, D.D. & Fairbank, J.F. 2002. Measuring and testing change in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 359-366.
Bergh, D.D., Hanke, R., Balkundi, P, Brown, M. & Chen, X. 2004. An assessment of research designs in strategic management research: The frequency of threats to internal validity. Research methodology in strategy and management, K.J. Ketchen, Jr. & D.D. Bergh (eds) 1: 303-346. Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier JAI.
Bergh, D.D., Ketchen, D.J. Jr., Boyd, B.K. & Bergh, J. 2010. New frontiers of the reputation-performance relationship: Insights from multiple theories. Journal of Management, 36: 620-632.
Berle, A.A. & Means, G.C. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Revised edition (1968), New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
Bertels, S. & Peloza, J. 2008. Running just to stand still? Managing CSR reputation in an era of ratcheting expectations. Corporate Reputation Review, 11: 56-72.
Bode, C., Wagner, S.M., Peterse, K.J. & Ellram, L.M. 2011. Understanding responses to supply chain disruptions: Insights from information processing and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 833-856.
Bower, J. 1970. Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment, Boston, MA.: Harvard University.
Boyd, B.K., Grove, S. & Hitt, M.A. 2005. Construct measurement in strategic management research: Illusion or reality? Strategic Management Journal, 26: 239-257.
Brammer, S. & Millington, A. 2008. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,29: 1325-1343.
Brammer, S.J. & Pavelin, S. 2006. Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 435-455.

Branco, M.C. & Rodrigues, L.L. 2006. Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69: 111-132.

Braybrooke, D. & Lindblom, C. 1963. A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process, Second edition (1970), New York: The Free Press, Macmillan Publishing.
Brown, B. & Perry, S. 1994. Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune's "most admired" companies. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1347-1359.

Buchholtz, A.K., Amason, A.C. & Rutherford, M.A. 1999. Beyond resources: The mediating effect of top management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy, Business & Society, 38: 167-187.
Bureau van Djik. 2011., accessed 2011-10-08.
Burke, L. & Logsdon, J.M. 1996. How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29: 495-502.

Business News Network. 2011. Unilever, P&G fined for price fixing., accessed 2011-04-13.

Campbell, J.L. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32: 946-967.

Cappetta, R. & Gioia, D.A. 2006. Fine fashion: Using symbolic artifacts, sensemaking, and sensegiving to construct identify and image. Artifacts and Organizations – Beyond Mere Symbolism, A. Rafaeli & M.G. Pratt (eds), 199-219. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Carroll, A.B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4: 497-505.

Carroll, A.B. 1999. Corporate social responsibility. Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38: 268-295.

Carroll, A.B. 2000. A commentary and an overview of key questions on corporate social performance measurement. Business & Society, 39: 466-478.

Carter, S.M. & Ruefli, T.W. 2006. Intra-industry reputation dynamics under a resource-based framework: Assessing the durability factor. Corporate Reputation Review, 9: 3-25.

Chan, D. 1998. The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1: 421-483.

Chan, D. & Schmitt, N. 2000. Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: A latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 190-210.

Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprises, Anchor Books edition (1966), Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Company, Inc.
Chatterji, A.K., Levine, D.I. & Toffel, M.W. 2009. How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18: 125-169.

Cheung, G.W. & Rensvold, R.B. 2002. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255.

Chiu, S-C. & Sharfman, M. 2009. Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: An investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management, OnlineFirst, DOI:10.1177/0149206309347958, 1-28. Now published November, 2011: 37: 1558-1585.

Cho, C.H., Roberts, R.W. & Patten, D.M. 2010. The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35: 431-443.
Choi, J. & Wang, H. 2009. Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 895-907.

Christmann, P. & Taylor, G. 2006. First self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 863-878.

Clarkson, M.B.E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20: 92-117.

Cochran, P.L. & Wood, R.A. 1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial
performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27: 42-56.

Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
David, P., Bloom, M. & Hillman, A.J. 2007. Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 91-100.

Davies, G., Chun, R., Vinhas da Silva, R. & Roper, S. 2003. Corporate reputation and competitiveness. London: Routledge.

Davis, K. 1973. The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16: 312-322.

Dawkins, J. & Lewis, S. 2003. CSR in stakeholder expectations: And their implication for company strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44: 185-193.

Deckop, J.R., Merriman, K.K., & Gupta, S. 2006. The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 32: 329-342.

Deephouse, D.L. & Carter, S.M. 2005. An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 329-360.
Delmas, M. & Blass, V.D. 2010 Measuring corporate environmental performance: The trade-offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19: 245-260.

den Hond, F. & de Bakker, F.G.A. 2007. Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32: 901-924.

Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P. & Roth, K. 2008. Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61: 1203-1218.

Diermeier, D. 2010. The Toyota recall: Understanding the real problem. Businessweek, February 9,, accessed 2011-04-26.

DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.

DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. 1991. Introduction. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, W.W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (eds), 1-38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Doh, J.P., Howton, S.D., Howton, S.W. & Siegel, D.S. 2010. Does the market respond to an endorsement of social responsibility? The role of institutions, information, and legitimacy. Journal of Management, 36: 1461-1485.

Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications, Academy of Management Review, 20: 65-91.
Driscoll, C. 2006. The not so clear-cut nature of organizational legitimating mechanisms in the Canadian forest sector. Business & Society, 45: 322-353.
Drucker, P. 1954. The Practice of Management, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
Drucker, P. 1984. The new meaning of corporate social responsibility, California Management Review, 26 (2): 53-63.
Entine, J. 2003. The myth of social investing. A critique of its practice and consequences for corporate social performance research. Organization & Environment, 16: 352-368.

Epstein, E. M. 1999. The continuing quest for accountable, ethical, and humane corporate capitalism, Business & Society, 38: 253-267.
Epstein, M. J. & Roy, M.-J. 2003. Making the business case for sustainability, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 9: 79-96.
Flanagan, D.J., O’Shaughnessy, K.C. & Palmer, T.B. 2011. Re-assessing the relationship between the Fortune reputation data and financial performance: Overwhelming influence or just a part of the puzzle? Corporate Reputation Review, 14: 3-14.

Fombrun, C.J. 1996. Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Fombrun, C.J. 2001. Corporate reputations as economic assets. The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, M.A. Hitt, R.E. Freeman & J.S. Harrison (eds): 289-312. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Publishers.

Fombrun, C.J., Gardberg, N.A. & Barnett, M.L. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105: 85-106.

Fombrun, C. J. & Shanley, M. 1990. What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 233-258.

Fombrun, C.J. & Van Riel, C.B.M. 2004. Fame & fortune. How successful companies build winning reputations. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Financial Times Prentice Hall.

Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). 2011., accessed 2011-06-10.

Fortune. 2008. America’s Most Admired Companies. ,last accessed 2010-02-03.

Fortune. 2009. World’s Most Admired Companies. ,last accessed 2010-02-03.

Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.

Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24: 191-205.

Fryxell, G. E. & Wang, J. 1994. The Fortune corporate "reputation" index: Reputation for what? Journal of Management, 20: 1-14.

Gardberg, N.A. & Fombrun, C.J. 2006. Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31: 329-346.

General Electric. 2007. Notice of 2007 annual meeting and proxy statement, February 28, 2007.

Godfrey, P.C. 2005. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30: 777-798.

Godfrey, P.C. & Hatch, N.W. 2007. Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70: 87-98.

Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B. & Hansen, J.M. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 425-445.

Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510.

Greve, H.R. & Goldeng, E. 2004. Longitudinal analysis in strategic management. Research methodology in strategy and management, K.J. Ketchen, Jr. & D.D. Bergh (eds), 1: 135-163. Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier JAI.

Griffin, J.J. 2000. Corporate social performance: Research directions for the 21st century. Business & Society, 39: 479-491.

Griffin, J. J & Mahon, J. F. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance
All items in Spectrum are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. The use of items is governed by Spectrum's terms of access.

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...

Concordia University - Footer